Herouth, thanks a lot for your answer. But I'm afraid I was rather unclear.
On 09-Jun-99 Herouth Maoz wrote:
> At 10:13 +0300 on 09/06/1999, Jeroen Schaap wrote:
>> Do you know of any way to generally convert arrays into query results?
>>
>> I know it is better to implement arrays as tables, bu
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Thyagarajan wrote:
> Hi
> Yes, i did build the Kernel with IPC enabled .
'K, that's the extent of my Linux knowledge *grin*
>
> The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> > Did you build the kernel with IPC enabled?
> >
> > On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Thyagarajan wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all
> >
Hi
Yes, i did build the Kernel with IPC enabled .
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> Did you build the kernel with IPC enabled?
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Thyagarajan wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> > I am in a fix right now - i have been trying to install Postgres
> > 6.4.2 on Linux ( Calderra Open Linux).
Did you build the kernel with IPC enabled?
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Thyagarajan wrote:
> Hi all
> I am in a fix right now - i have been trying to install Postgres
> 6.4.2 on Linux ( Calderra Open Linux).
> Everything goes on fine - i.e. configure,installation etc.
>
>At the time of sta
Hi all
I am in a fix right now - i have been trying to install Postgres
6.4.2 on Linux ( Calderra Open Linux).
Everything goes on fine - i.e. configure,installation etc.
At the time of starting of the Postmaster ( postmaster -S -D 'Data
Directory'), I get the following error :
IP
>
> I defined a new type, and it is essential that I am able to use it in
> an index. This seems to require a bit more than just having the
> comparison operators. On the create index page it seems that it is
> necessary to define an *_ops class for the new type, but I have no idea
> how
Hi,
I defined a new type, and it is essential that I am able to use it in
an index. This seems to require a bit more than just having the
comparison operators. On the create index page it seems that it is
necessary to define an *_ops class for the new type, but I have no idea
how I go abo
At 10:13 +0300 on 09/06/1999, Jeroen Schaap wrote:
> Do you know of any way to generally convert arrays into query results?
>
> I know it is better to implement arrays as tables, but that results in
> unreadable tables (with 10 rows with id=1, 15 with id=2, 2 with id=3 ad
> infundum...).
>
> So
