I saw that you can have functions written in C or SQL, but can you write a
precompiled SQL statement (such as SELECT * FROM tablename WHERE ...) that
returns a set of rows? I couldn't find anything that addresses this in the
documentation (does that mean it can't be done yet?).
--
Nick Urbanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Does anyone know where RPMs of PostgreSQL 6.4 are?
I've put together RPMs for the forthcoming SuSE Linux 6.0; a pre-release
is available at ftp.suse.com -- I don't have the exact URL at hand; but
it should be pretty obvious: /pub/*beta*/suse/ap1 (drop
On Mon, 14 Dec 1998, Clark Evans wrote:
> Anyone working on Row level locking and
> on-line recovery?
row level loocking shoudl be in place for v6.5...not sure about
on-line recovery, but I *believe* Jan is working on redo-log support...
Marc G. Fournier
Anyone working on Row level locking and
on-line recovery?
I have some ideas (and questions) in this area.
Also, I was wondering if there is a "transaction
server" project, i.e., a server that helps provide
a consistent client interface to both the database and
application servers.
Thank you!
Is there anyone working on XML integration?
Services include:
a) Import/Export to XML (DTD defines schema)
b) Access (through stored procedures) to XML (PSAX anyone?)
b) Emulated tables (that direct queries to XML queries)?
c) Other fun XML items.
:) Clark
Sorry, I'm sure someone must have asked this before, but searching
through my mailing lists revealed nothing.
Does anyone know where RPMs of PostgreSQL 6.4 are?
--
Nick Urbanik, Dept. of Electrical & Communications Engineering
Hong Kong Technical College (Tsing Yi)
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMA
Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>
> My words might be obscure.
>
> What I meant was
>
> How writers block other writers in LLL ?
>
> Certainly readers block no writers(readers) in LLL.
> But writers block no writers or the same-row writers or the same-table
> writers ?
>
> Currently writers block the s
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vadim
> Mikheev
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 1998 5:03 PM
> To: Hiroshi Inoue
> Cc: The Hermit Hacker; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] TODO list elements
>
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> >
> > >
Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>
> > And note - this will be not row level locking, but
> > multi-version concurrency control.
> >
>
> What does it mean ?
> LLL in 6.5 doesn't include row level locking ?
One systems (Informix, Sybase) use locking for concurrency control,
another ones (Oracle, Interbase)
