On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 6:00 PM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 5:44 PM Pavel Luzanov wrote:
> > I see a perfectly working TID-store optimization.
> > With reduced maintenance_work_mem it used only one 'vacuuming indexes'
> > phase instead of 21 in v16.
> > But I also expected to
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 1:47 PM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 1:29 PM Melanie Plageman
> wrote:
> > I'll investigate more tomorrow, but based on my initial investigation,
> > there appears to be some interaction related to how much of the
> &g
