Hi,
Does anyone here know, if postgresql supports DIN SPEC 91379 encoding?
As far as I understand it is a “new” encoding supporting all “EU characters”
based on Unicode, but is not compliant to UTF-8. As far as I di dread, there
are a few characters in DIN SOEC 91379 that are not within UTF-8.
Hi Marco,
On 27 Mar 2022, at 12:54, Marco Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone here know, if postgresql supports DIN SPEC 91379 encoding?
>
> As far as I understand it is a “new” encoding supporting all “EU characters”
> based on Unicode, but is not compliant to UTF-8. As far as I di dread, the
On 2022-Mar-27, Ralf Schuchardt wrote:
> where did you read, that this DIN SPEC 91379 norm is incompatible with UTF-8?
>
> In the document „String.Latin+ 1.2: eine kommentierte und erweiterte
> Fassung der DIN SPEC 91379. Inklusive einer umfangreichen Liste häufig
> gestellter Fragen. Herausgegeb
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> On 2022-Mar-27, Ralf Schuchardt wrote:
>> linked here https://www.xoev.de/downloads-2316#StringLatin it is said,
>> that the spec is a strict subset of unicode (E.1.6), and it is also
>> mentioned in E.1.4, that in UTF-8 all unicode characters can be
>> encoded. Therefore
U+ is not part of DIN SPEC 91379.
--
Boris
> Am 27.03.2022 um 19:47 schrieb Alvaro Herrera :
>
> On 2022-Mar-27, Ralf Schuchardt wrote:
>
>> where did you read, that this DIN SPEC 91379 norm is incompatible with UTF-8?
>>
>> In the document „String.Latin+ 1.2: eine kommentierte und erwei
Hi there,
i recently stumbled upon a performance issue which i can't really understand.
The issue occured when i (roughly) did the following without a commit in
between:
* Replace the PK column of a table A which has a referencing table B - I
have removed the FK from the referencing tables
On 3/27/22 09:30, Per Kaminsky wrote:
Hi there,
i recently stumbled upon a performance issue which i can't
really understand.
The issue occured when i (roughly) did the following without a commit in
between:
* Replace the PK column of a table A which has a referencing table B -
I have
On 2022-03-27 14:06:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > On 2022-Mar-27, Ralf Schuchardt wrote:
> >> linked here https://www.xoev.de/downloads-2316#StringLatin it is said,
> >> that the spec is a strict subset of unicode (E.1.6), and it is also
> >> mentioned in E.1.4, that in UT
