Team,
Are there any disadvantages of increasing the “wal_keep_segments” to a higher
number say, 500? Will it have any impact on performance of streaming
replication, on primary or secondary servers?
Thanks & Regards
Pranjal Shukla
On 2022-Mar-22, Shukla, Pranjal wrote:
> Team,
> Are there any disadvantages of increasing the “wal_keep_segments” to a
> higher number say, 500? Will it have any impact on performance of
> streaming replication, on primary or secondary servers?
No. It just means WAL will occupy more disk space.
Hi!
I need to get the primary keys of a few tables for some code that I'm writing
in C. I've found out how to do this through regular SQL code and I know that I
can use that SQL code through the SPI. But I was just wondering if there is a
better/faster way to get information like this directly
Oskar Stenberg writes:
> I need to get the primary keys of a few tables for some code that I'm writing
> in C. I've found out how to do this through regular SQL code and I know that
> I can use that SQL code through the SPI. But I was just wondering if there is
> a better/faster way to get info
