Nothing was change, Postgres 10, Ubuntu 16.04 and Schema was the same, before
and after that problem.
Well, that database is replicated and on replicated server that problem
doesn´t occur.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-general-f1843780.html
Hi,
I am using Jboss EAP 6.1 version. For Database i am using the postgres
9.3 version. Can i upgrade to postgres 9.6 without any issue. I am also
considering to implement BDR 2.0, please let me know how i can get the
licensing details.
--
with regards
A H S Phanindra
On 2/4/19 2:10 AM, A H S Phanindra wrote:
Hi,
I am using Jboss EAP 6.1 version. For Database i am using the
postgres 9.3 version. Can i upgrade to postgres 9.6 without any issue. I
Don't know. A place you might find out:
https://developer.jboss.org/en/products/eap
am also considering
On 2/4/19 3:13 AM, PegoraroF10 wrote:
Nothing was change, Postgres 10, Ubuntu 16.04 and Schema was the same, before
and after that problem.
Well something changed or you would not be having a problem.
Well, that database is replicated and on replicated server that problem
doesn´t occur.
Def
Am 04.02.19 um 11:10 schrieb A H S Phanindra:
Hi,
I am using Jboss EAP 6.1 version. For Database i am using the
postgres 9.3 version. Can i upgrade to postgres 9.6 without any issue.
should work, but you should test it.
I am also considering to implement BDR 2.0, please let me know ho
About replication ... Logical Replication with CREATE
PUBLICATION/SUBSCRIPTION.
Yes, some DDL commands were ran on that server but none of them were related
with that select.
Let me explain better. We have a single server with a single database on it.
Each customer has its own schema and connects
On 2/4/19 7:33 AM, PegoraroF10 wrote:
About replication ... Logical Replication with CREATE
PUBLICATION/SUBSCRIPTION.
Yes, some DDL commands were ran on that server but none of them were related
with that select.
Let me explain better. We have a single server with a single database on it.
Each c
On 2019-02-04 05:34, Syed Jafri wrote:
> |-|--|-|--|
> | Receiver | Event | Date|
> Location|
> |-|--|-|--
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 10:35 PM Syed Jafri wrote:
> · Receiver names are of the type (a-z, 1-5, .)
>
> · 95% of all queries currently look like this: SELECT * FROM table
> WHERE Receiver = Alpha, with the new format this would be SELECT * FROM table
> WHERE receivers @> '"Alpha"'
Olá Marcos,
On Mon, 2019-02-04 at 08:33 -0700, PegoraroF10 wrote:
> About replication ... Logical Replication with CREATE
> PUBLICATION/SUBSCRIPTION.
>
> Yes, some DDL commands were ran on that server but none of them were
> related
> with that select.
> Let me explain better. We have a single se
10 matches
Mail list logo