How to understand "because you could
easily get into a situation where *none* of the nodes represent truth."?
In current design, when a user commits, it will first commit on primary,
and then is waiting for slave ack. if slaves and primary are splitted in
the network, then the user commit command
qihua wu writes:
> We are using patroni to set up 1 primary and 5 slaves, and using ANY 2 (*)
> to commit a transaction if any 2 standbys receive the WAL. If there is a
> network partitioning between the primary and the slave, then commit will
> hang from user perspective, but the commit is actual
We are using patroni to set up 1 primary and 5 slaves, and using ANY 2 (*)
to commit a transaction if any 2 standbys receive the WAL. If there is a
network partitioning between the primary and the slave, then commit will
hang from user perspective, but the commit is actually done locally, just
wait
