> >> > how can i have the same in pg10 as i have had in pg 9.x?
> >>
> >> Move the function call to the FROM clause:
> >>
> >> select g, (g - 1) % 5 + 1 from generate_series(1, 10) g;
> >
> > thank you. That is exact what i need.
> >
> >
> >> > I need it to date type to... if possible.
> >>
> >> T
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Márcio A. Sepp
wrote:
>
>> > how can i have the same in pg10 as i have had in pg 9.x?
>>
>> Move the function call to the FROM clause:
>>
>> select g, (g - 1) % 5 + 1 from generate_series(1, 10) g;
>
> thank you. That is exact what i need.
>
>
>> > I need it to dat
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:19 PM, Adrian Klaver
wrote:
> On 01/08/2018 05:25 PM, Márcio A. Sepp wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> In pg10 generation series doesn't work like in 9.5.
>> Ex. in 9.5:
>> z=# select generate_series(1, 10), generate_series(1, 5);
>> generate_series | generate_series
>>
Márcio A. Sepp wrote:
> > There is a generate_series() variant that can return dates (more
> > precisely, timestamp with time zone). But what exactly would you like
> > returned?
>
> In the past i use querys like this to generate some timestamp field:
> select generate_series (1, 10), generate_s
> > how can i have the same in pg10 as i have had in pg 9.x?
>
> Move the function call to the FROM clause:
>
> select g, (g - 1) % 5 + 1 from generate_series(1, 10) g;
thank you. That is exact what i need.
> > I need it to date type to... if possible.
>
> There is a generate_series() vari
2018-01-09 11:01 GMT+01:00 Alvaro Herrera :
> Márcio A. Sepp wrote:
>
>> how can i have the same in pg10 as i have had in pg 9.x?
>
> Move the function call to the FROM clause:
>
> select g, (g - 1) % 5 + 1 from generate_series(1, 10) g;
>
>> I need it to date type to... if possible.
>
> There is
Márcio A. Sepp wrote:
> how can i have the same in pg10 as i have had in pg 9.x?
Move the function call to the FROM clause:
select g, (g - 1) % 5 + 1 from generate_series(1, 10) g;
> I need it to date type to... if possible.
There is a generate_series() variant that can return dates (more
On Monday, January 8, 2018, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>
> I am not seeing a solution, but you might see something that would help
> you.
There is no general solution. For the problem at hand I would union two
generate_series(1,5) queries with a query_id column. Then I'd use
row_number() over (orde
On 01/08/2018 05:25 PM, Márcio A. Sepp wrote:
Hi,
In pg10 generation series doesn't work like in 9.5.
Ex. in 9.5:
z=# select generate_series(1, 10), generate_series(1, 5);
generate_series | generate_series
-+-
1 | 1
Hi,
In pg10 generation series doesn't work like in 9.5.
Ex. in 9.5:
z=# select generate_series(1, 10), generate_series(1, 5);
generate_series | generate_series
-+-
1 | 1
2 | 2
3 |
10 matches
Mail list logo