; connecting to A (half of them need to be changed to B anyway) while B is
> catching up on its lag. You probably have at least that much down-time to
> change the connections anyway.
>
> Regards,
>
> Alban.
>
>
>> From: Alban Hertroys
>> Sent: Monday, Augu
icates to D
>>
> End state:
> A replicates to D
> B replicates to C
>>
>> we remove some of the dbs from A and B, then reassign the traffic based on
>> db selections
>>
>> I hope it all makes sense...
>>
>> Thank you
> It does to me. Now
_
From: Alban Hertroys
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2019 5:01 AM
To: Julie Nishimura
Cc: Adrian Klaver ;
pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org ;
pgsql-general
Subject: Re: adding more space to the existing server
On 5 Aug 2019, at 0:39, Julie Nishimura
mailto:juliez...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
ons
I hope it all makes sense...
Thank you
It does to me. Now would be a good time for people to chime in if they
don't agree ;)
From: Alban Hertroys
Sent: Saturday, August 3, 2019 3:15 AM
To: Julie Nishimura
Cc: Adrian Klaver ;
pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org ;
pgsql-general
Subject:
ishimura
Cc: Adrian Klaver ;
pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org ;
pgsql-general
Subject: Re: adding more space to the existing server
> On 2 Aug 2019, at 21:45, Julie Nishimura wrote:
> 1) We use streaming replication, and due to hardware limitation, we cannot
> add more drives to the e
> On 2 Aug 2019, at 21:45, Julie Nishimura wrote:
> 1) We use streaming replication, and due to hardware limitation, we cannot
> add more drives to the existing host. That is why we thought by breaking the
> existing streaming replication (from a->b), instead of currently identical
> standby
On 8/2/19 12:45 PM, Julie Nishimura wrote:
Thanks for your replies.
1) We use streaming replication, and due to hardware limitation, we
cannot add more drives to the existing host. That is why we thought by
breaking the existing streaming replication (from a->b), instead of
currently identica
ostgres
Thank you!
From: Adrian Klaver
Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2019 7:28 AM
To: Julie Nishimura ; pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
; pgsql-general
Subject: Re: adding more space to the existing server
On 7/31/19 3:21 PM, Julie Nishimura wrote:
>
On 7/31/19 3:21 PM, Julie Nishimura wrote:
Hello postgres folks,
We're tossing around the idea of upgrading a replicated postgres cluster
(37 dbs) by breaking the replication, adding different size (larger)
data disks to the hot-spare, then turning replication back on, letting
it fully popula
On 7/31/19 5:21 PM, Julie Nishimura wrote:
Hello postgres folks,
We're tossing around the idea of upgrading a replicated postgres cluster
(37 dbs) by breaking the replication, adding different size (larger) data
disks to the hot-spare, then turning replication back on, letting it fully
popula
Hello postgres folks,
We're tossing around the idea of upgrading a replicated postgres cluster (37
dbs) by breaking the replication, adding different size (larger) data disks to
the hot-spare, then turning replication back on, letting it fully populate,
then breaking replication, making the sta
11 matches
Mail list logo
