On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:50 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:15:29AM -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote:
> > Oh, perhaps I do, depending on what you mean by worker. There are a
> couple
> > of periodic processes that connect to the server to obtain metrics. Is
> that
> > what is t
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:15:29AM -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote:
> Oh, perhaps I do, depending on what you mean by worker. There are a couple
> of periodic processes that connect to the server to obtain metrics. Is that
> what is triggering this issue? In my case I could probably suspend them
> unti
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 4:54 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 08:31:50AM +0200, Alexander Kukushkin wrote:
> > 2018-08-29 6:02 GMT+02:00 Dave Peticolas :
> >> Hello, I'm seeing some issues with WAL replay on a test server running
> >> 9.6.10 using WAL archived from a 9.6.8 prim
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 08:31:50AM +0200, Alexander Kukushkin wrote:
> 2018-08-29 6:02 GMT+02:00 Dave Peticolas :
>> Hello, I'm seeing some issues with WAL replay on a test server running
>> 9.6.10 using WAL archived from a 9.6.8 primary server. It reliably PANICs
>> during replay with messages lik
Hi,
2018-08-29 6:02 GMT+02:00 Dave Peticolas :
> Hello, I'm seeing some issues with WAL replay on a test server running
> 9.6.10 using WAL archived from a 9.6.8 primary server. It reliably PANICs
> during replay with messages like so:
>
> WARNING: page 1209270272 of relation base/16422/47496599
On 29 August 2018 06:26:06 CEST, Dave Peticolas wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 9:21 PM Andreas Kretschmer
>
>wrote:
>
>> On 29 August 2018 06:02:45 CEST, Dave Peticolas
>wrote:
>> >Hello, I'm seeing some issues with WAL replay on a test server
>running
>> >9.6.10 using WAL archived from a 9.6.8
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 9:21 PM Andreas Kretschmer
wrote:
> On 29 August 2018 06:02:45 CEST, Dave Peticolas wrote:
> >Hello, I'm seeing some issues with WAL replay on a test server running
> >9.6.10 using WAL archived from a 9.6.8 primary server. It reliably
> >
>
> Can you tell us the wal-level
On 29 August 2018 06:02:45 CEST, Dave Peticolas wrote:
>Hello, I'm seeing some issues with WAL replay on a test server running
>9.6.10 using WAL archived from a 9.6.8 primary server. It reliably
>
Can you tell us the wal-level?
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company
Hello, I'm seeing some issues with WAL replay on a test server running
9.6.10 using WAL archived from a 9.6.8 primary server. It reliably PANICs
during replay with messages like so:
WARNING: page 1209270272 of relation base/16422/47496599 does not exist
CONTEXT: xlog redo at 4810/C84F8A0 for Btr
