On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 9:20 AM Dominique Devienne
wrote:
> Once again, this is late, although my original questions are now 2 weeks
> old.
> After all, PQsocketPoll() has not been released yet officially. Thanks,
> --DD
>
As this is so new, you might have better luck on -hackers than here. I've
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 12:23 PM Dominique Devienne wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 2:50 PM Dominique Devienne
> wrote:
> > Hi. I've now used successfully the new PQsocketPoll() API
> > in the context of waiting for notifications, using beta2 and 3.
> >
> > But now I'm looking into using it in
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 2:50 PM Dominique Devienne wrote:
> Hi. I've now used successfully the new PQsocketPoll() API
> in the context of waiting for notifications, using beta2 and 3.
>
> But now I'm looking into using it in the context of PIPELINE mode.
> Where I suppose both forRead and forWrite
Hi. I've now used successfully the new PQsocketPoll() API
in the context of waiting for notifications, using beta2 and 3.
But now I'm looking into using it in the context of PIPELINE mode.
Where I suppose both forRead and forWrite are 1, but the return
code only indicates whether the condition is
