Ah no it is not. Something else was changed at the same time. Sigh.
Thanks for clarifying David
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 10:42 AM Stefan Knecht
wrote:
> But that "invalid" index is being used by queries
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 10:41 AM David G. Johnston <
> david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wr
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 8:43 PM Stefan Knecht
wrote:
> But that "invalid" index is being used by queries
>
>>
>>
Please don't top-post.
If it is used by queries it isn't invalid and thus its existence shouldn't
be surprising. So I'm not sure what you are saying.
David J.
But that "invalid" index is being used by queries
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 10:41 AM David G. Johnston <
david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 8:37 PM Stefan Knecht
> wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> Why does this happen?
>>
>> profile_aggregates=> create index concurrently foo_i
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 8:37 PM Stefan Knecht
wrote:
> Hello
>
> Why does this happen?
>
> profile_aggregates=> create index concurrently foo_idx on agg (status,
> foots, created_ts);
>
>
> ^CCancel request sent
> ERROR: canceling statement due to user request
> profile_aggregates=>
> profile_ag
Hello
Why does this happen?
profile_aggregates=> create index concurrently foo_idx on agg (status,
foots, created_ts);
^CCancel request sent
ERROR: canceling statement due to user request
profile_aggregates=>
profile_aggregates=> create index concurrently foo_idx on agg (status,
foots, create
