Fra: Dave Cramer
>>> It would be nice if Npgsql (and jdbc and others) emulated the libpq
>>> behaviour.
>>> Because in my mind, abstracting hostname, portnumber and databasename
>>> away is a really useful feature.
>>>
>>> How do others manage this?
>>
>>Either they don't or they write their ow
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 at 04:51, Niels Jespersen wrote:
> >On Sat, 2021-01-30 at 15:56 +, Niels Jespersen wrote:
> >> It would be nice if Npgsql (and jdbc and others) emulated the libpq
> behaviour.
> >> Because in my mind, abstracting hostname, portnumber and databasename
> >> away is a really
>On Sat, 2021-01-30 at 15:56 +, Niels Jespersen wrote:
>> It would be nice if Npgsql (and jdbc and others) emulated the libpq
>> behaviour.
>> Because in my mind, abstracting hostname, portnumber and databasename
>> away is a really useful feature.
>>
>> How do others manage this?
>
>Eithe
On Sat, 2021-01-30 at 15:56 +, Niels Jespersen wrote:
> It would be nice if Npgsql (and jdbc and others) emulated the libpq behaviour.
> Because in my mind, abstracting hostname, portnumber and databasename
> away is a really useful feature.
>
> How do others manage this?
Either they don'
>
>
>-Oprindelig meddelelse-
>Fra: Laurenz Albe
>Sendt: 29. januar 2021 20:14
>Til: Niels Jespersen ; pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
>Emne: Re: Npgsql and the Connection Service File
>
>On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 14:13 +, Niels Jespersen wrote:
>> Is there a way to get Npgsql understan