On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:51:10PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> FYI, in recent discussions on the docs list:
>
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CABUevEyumGh3r05U3_mhRrEU=dfacdrr2hew140mvn7fsbm...@mail.gmail.com
I did not recall this one. Thanks for the reminder, Bruce.
> There
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 04:50:38PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Vik Fearing
> wrote:
>
> On 21/06/18 07:27, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Attached is a patch which includes your suggestion. What do you think?
> > As that's an improvement, only HEAD
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 04:50:38PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> Generally only actual bug fixes get back-patched; but I'd have to say
> this looks like it could easily be classified as one.
Everybody is against me here ;)
> Some comments on the patch itself:
>
> "recover up to the wanted re
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 04:42:00PM -0400, Ravi Krishna wrote:
> Same here even though I use Mac mail. But it is not yahoo alone.
> Most of the web email clients have resorted to top posting. I miss
> the old days of Outlook Express which was so '>' friendly. I think
> Gmail allows '>' when you c
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Vik Fearing
wrote:
> On 21/06/18 07:27, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Attached is a patch which includes your suggestion. What do you think?
> > As that's an improvement, only HEAD would get that clarification.
>
> Say what? If the clarification applies to previous
On 21/06/18 07:27, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Attached is a patch which includes your suggestion. What do you think?
> As that's an improvement, only HEAD would get that clarification.
Say what? If the clarification applies to previous versions, as it
does, it should be backpatched. This isn't a
>
>
> >You should avoid top-posting on the Postgres lists, this is not the
> >usual style used by people around :)
>
> Will do, but Yahoo Mail! does not seem to like that, so I am typing the >
> myself
>
Same here even though I use Mac mail. But it is not yahoo alone.
Most of the web email c
Hi Michael
On Thursday, June 21, 2018, 7:28:13 AM GMT+2, Michael Paquier
wrote:
>You should avoid top-posting on the Postgres lists, this is not the
>usual style used by people around :)
Will do, but Yahoo Mail! does not seem to like that, so I am typing the > myself
>Attached is a pat
On 06/21/2018 12:27 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
[snip]
Attached is a patch which includes your suggestion. What do you think?
As that's an improvement, only HEAD would get that clarification.
You've *got* to be kidding.
Fixing an ambiguously or poorly worded bit of *documentation* should
obvi
Hi Pierre,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 08:06:31AM +, Pierre Timmermans wrote:
> Hi Michael
You should avoid top-posting on the Postgres lists, this is not the
usual style used by people around :)
> Thanks for the confirmation. Your rewording removes the confusion. I
> would maybe take the opport
Hi Michael
Thanks for the confirmation. Your rewording removes the confusion. I would
maybe take the opportunity to re-instate that pg_dump cannot be used for PITR,
so in the line of
"These are backups that could be used for point-in-time recovery if
combined with a WAL archive able to recover up
Hi Pierre,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:03:58PM +, Pierre Timmermans wrote:
> Here is the doc, the sentence that I find misleading is "There are
> backups that cannot be used for point-in-time recovery", also
> mentioning that they are faster than pg_dumps add to confusion (since
> pg_dumps cann
12 matches
Mail list logo
