o:mich...@paquier.xyz>
> >> Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Dezember 2019 02:43
> >> An: Zwettler Markus (OIZ) <mailto:markus.zwett...@zuerich.ch>
> >> Cc: Stephen Frost <mailto:sfr...@snowman.net>; mailto:
> pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
> >> Betreff:
> pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
> > Betreff: Re: archiving question
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 03:04:55PM +, Zwettler Markus (OIZ) wrote:
> > > What do you mean hear?
> > >
> > > Afaik, Postgres runs the archive_command per log, means log by
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 03:04:55PM +, Zwettler Markus (OIZ) wrote:
> What do you mean hear?
>
> Afaik, Postgres runs the archive_command per log, means log by log by log.
>
> How should we parallelize this?
You can, in theory, skip the archiving for a couple of segments and
then do the opera
Greetings,
* Zwettler Markus (OIZ) (markus.zwett...@zuerich.ch) wrote:
> When there is a Postgres archiver stuck because of filled pg_xlog and archive
> directories...
>
> ... and the pg_xlog directory had been filled with dozens of GBs of xlogs...
>
> ...it takes ages until the archive_command
