Re: Temporal tables as part of main release

"Hope" does *not* mean "likely". On 6/19/21 11:24 AM, Anand Sowmithiran wrote: Sure, hence I wrote "likely"! On Sat, 19 Jun 2021, 8:10 pm Tom Lane, > wrote: Anand Sowmithiran mailto:anand@gmail.com>> writes: > This is very helpful to know , we *_

Re: Temporal tables as part of main release

Sure, hence I wrote "likely"! On Sat, 19 Jun 2021, 8:10 pm Tom Lane, wrote: > Anand Sowmithiran writes: > > This is very helpful to know , we *can* *likely count* on temporal to > be part > > of PG 15 !! > > You were just told *not* to count on that. Maybe it'll happen, > but I wouldn't ta

Re: Temporal tables as part of main release

Anand Sowmithiran writes: > This is very helpful to know , we can likely count on temporal to be part > of PG 15 !! You were just told *not* to count on that. Maybe it'll happen, but I wouldn't take bets on it. regards, tom lane

Re: Temporal tables as part of main release

This is very helpful to know , we can likely count on temporal to be part of PG 15 !! I would be using Postgresql via Azure cloud[with Citus], so looking forward to use temporal features in my current development [using Extension] and then once it is part of PG 15, I guess that would make MSFT to s

Re: Temporal tables as part of main release

On 6/17/21 11:10 PM, David G. Johnston wrote: And, since its not in the commitfest app, and the last emails I found are over a year old, it doesn’t seem to be a priority for anyone at this time. I'm working on the application-time (aka valid-time) side of this, and there is another patch for

Re: Temporal tables as part of main release

On Thursday, June 17, 2021, Anand Sowmithiran wrote: > I am looking to use the temporal tables feature for keeping track of > changes to my table data. As of now, there is an pgxn.org provided > extension by which we could leverage this functionality, but *when > Temporal tables will become part