Re: PLPGSQL - extra column existence in trigger

2022-05-23 Thread Durumdara
Hello! Peter J. Holzer ezt írta (időpont: 2022. máj. 11., Sze, 0:44): > On 2022-05-07 15:02:09 +0200, Durumdara wrote: > > > So in the new trigger we can't load them all with: > > How do you get a new trigger on one table but not the new columns on the > other table? Wouldn't you update both at

Re: PLPGSQL - extra column existence in trigger

2022-05-11 Thread hubert depesz lubaczewski
On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 07:41:44AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > No. I’d probably approach this by generically converting the NEW record to > json and working with that. Non-existent object keys return null when > accessed. One note - in my tests working with hstore was significantly faster

Re: PLPGSQL - extra column existence in trigger

2022-05-10 Thread Peter J. Holzer
On 2022-05-07 15:02:09 +0200, Durumdara wrote: > We stored the username in a temporary table which was created by the client > app. > With this technique we can log these names in triggers too. > > Now we extend it with user id and later the comp name. > > Because we can update the client applica

Re: PLPGSQL - extra column existence in trigger

2022-05-09 Thread Durumdara
Dear David! That was a very good idea! I have integrated it! :-) Priorly I had another idea: I made a DDL to extend the table with "add column if not exists" elements. But what you suggested is better. Thank you! Best wishes dd David G. Johnston ezt írta (időpont: 2022. máj. 7., Szo, 16:41):

Re: PLPGSQL - extra column existence in trigger

2022-05-07 Thread David G. Johnston
On Saturday, May 7, 2022, Durumdara wrote: > > > So is there any syntax to not fall on missing columns? > No. I’d probably approach this by generically converting the NEW record to json and working with that. Non-existent object keys return null when accessed. David J.