Thanks very much. I tested with a much bigger table and it seems that it is
using the default .005 selectivity for this integer column. Cool. Nice to
understand even if it was just a typo that had things going off the rails.
And thanks for your work 3 years ago for that commit.
Michael Lewis writes:
> Simplified example query-
> explain
> select * from organizations o where id = id;
> On a PG10 instance I get-
> Seq Scan on organizations o (cost=0.00..4.21 ***rows=1*** width=37)
> Filter: (id = id)
> On a PG11 instance with the same or very very similar data, I get-
>
