Hi David,
Got your point.
Thank you for the help.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 9:07 PM David G. Johnston <
david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 8:31 AM, saurabh shelar
> wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Thank you for the help.
>>
>> I was just got confused with the below line men
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 8:31 AM, saurabh shelar
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thank you for the help.
>
> I was just got confused with the below line mentioned in the document.
> However, it seems it is still the same behaviour *(i.e --no-psqlrc)*.
>
> *"Before PostgreSQL 9.6, the -c option implied -X (
Hi David,
Thank you for the help.
I was just got confused with the below line mentioned in the document.
However, it seems it is still the same behaviour *(i.e --no-psqlrc)*.
*"Before PostgreSQL 9.6, the -c option implied -X (--no-psqlrc); this is no
longer the case."*
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 8
On Wednesday, August 29, 2018, saurabh shelar
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thank you for the swift response.
>
> However, could you please confirm if the below scenario is expected.
>
> - included the alias in the file.
> - And passed the file with psql and it worked.
>
> *-bash-4.2$ cat test *
> *:tes
Hi David,
Thank you for the swift response.
However, could you please confirm if the below scenario is expected.
- included the alias in the file.
- And passed the file with psql and it worked.
*-bash-4.2$ cat test *
*:testing*
*-bash-4.2$ /opt/PostgreSQL/9.6/bin/psql -f test *
* id *
**
*
On Wednesday, August 29, 2018, saurabh shelar
wrote:
>
> As per the document from PG-9.6 it is possible.
>
You cannot use psql variables with -c
“ command must be either a command string that is completely parsable by
the server (i.e., it contains no psql-specific features), or a single
backslas
