On Thu, 2020-12-31 at 17:38 +0100, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> I have the following table containing 100+ millions rows currently and
> which needs to be queried by "captured_at" a lot. That table stores
> rows for the last 6 years, but most of the queries focus on the last
> 15 months, 15 days or r
My apologies. You are correct. My brain may have already switched to
holiday mode.
Hopefully others will chime in shortly.
Guten Tag Michael Lewis,
am Donnerstag, 31. Dezember 2020 um 19:28 schrieben Sie:
> select
>t.reloptions
> from pg_class t
> join pg_namespace n on n.oid = t.relnamespace
> where t.relname = 'clt_rec'
> and n.nspname = 'public';
That outputs NULL, as well for other tested indexes. Add
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 11:18 AM Thorsten Schöning
wrote:
> Guten Tag Michael Lewis,
> am Donnerstag, 31. Dezember 2020 um 18:20 schrieben Sie:
>
> > Why is your fillfactor so low?[...]
>
> I've just copied what my GUI-tool pgModeler generated as SQL right
> now, that fill factor might have never
Guten Tag Michael Lewis,
am Donnerstag, 31. Dezember 2020 um 18:20 schrieben Sie:
> Why is your fillfactor so low?[...]
I've just copied what my GUI-tool pgModeler generated as SQL right
now, that fill factor might have never been applied at all.
> Perhaps a silly question, but do you have an in
Why is your fillfactor so low? That seems pretty crazy, especially for a
table with only 4 columns that are fixed width. 100 million rows with so
little data in each row is not very much at all. You should be looking to
other solutions before partitioning I expect.
Perhaps a silly question, but do
