> On Apr 27, 2025, at 06:54, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> I agree with him, though, that this a foot-gun: most table's aren't that
> UPDATE heavy.
There is plenty of precedent for GUCs that seem to be useful, but really should
never be touched except in the case of fairly uncommon workloads. Ho
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 10:31 PM Marcelo Fernandes
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have a scenario where virtually all user tables in the database will
> need to
> have a lower fill factor.
>
> It would have been handy to have a way to set this default, but as of now,
> I
> don't think the default can b
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 at 14:31, Marcelo Fernandes wrote:
> I have a scenario where virtually all user tables in the database will need to
> have a lower fill factor.
> Does this make sense? Have I missed something about being able to change this
> on a database level?
I suspect that it's possible
> On Apr 26, 2025, at 19:31, Marcelo Fernandes wrote:
> Does this make sense? Have I missed something about being able to change this
> on a database level?
You haven't missed anything; there's no setting that controls the default for
fillfactor.
Everyone's use-case is different, of course,
