Re: Back Port Request for INVALID Startup Packet

2020-03-12 Thread Fabio Ugo Venchiarutti
On 12/03/2020 00:29, Tom Lane wrote: Virendra Kumar writes: Can you please back port patch where if a 0 byte packet sent to PG instance (Health Checks), it starts complaining about invalid startup packet and flood the log which increases log size considerably if the health checks are every 3

Re: Back Port Request for INVALID Startup Packet

2020-03-11 Thread Laurenz Albe
On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 01:16 +, Virendra Kumar wrote: > This is simple patch, would that impact badly if patched to prior versions or > some other > constraints forced to not do that. I am just trying to understand this a bit. It is not that this patch would have a terrible impact. There is a

Re: Back Port Request for INVALID Startup Packet

2020-03-11 Thread Virendra Kumar
Hi Tom, Thank you for your reply! This is simple patch, would that impact badly if patched to prior versions or some other constraints forced to not do that. I am just trying to understand this a bit. On AWS RDS we have primary and secondary hosts known in advance in most cases. So if a primary

Re: Back Port Request for INVALID Startup Packet

2020-03-11 Thread Tom Lane
Virendra Kumar writes: > Can you please back port patch where if a 0 byte packet sent to PG instance > (Health Checks), it starts complaining about invalid startup packet and flood > the log which increases log size considerably if the health checks are every > 3 seconds or something like that.