My patch was partially merged at
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=52dcfda48778d16683c64ca4372299a099a15b96
.
Thanks to everyone involved in this discussion.
pá 13. 12. 2019 v 2:11 odesílatel Josef Šimánek
napsal:
> I was thinking about this problem and possible
On 2019-11-21 16:48:14 +, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 at 15:32, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > On 2019-11-21 09:43:26 +, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> > > It wasn't meant to be insulting, I meant "esoteric" in the strict
> > > sense: that you need to have specific knowledge to parse
On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 at 15:32, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2019-11-21 09:43:26 +, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> > It wasn't meant to be insulting, I meant "esoteric" in the strict
> > sense: that you need to have specific knowledge to parse them.
>
> I didn't understand it as insulting (why would I?)
On 2019-11-21 09:43:26 +, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 22:48, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> >
> > On 2019-11-19 11:37:04 +, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> > > Even if you do that you're still requiring the user to parse syntax
> > > according to esoteric rules.
> >
> > Oh, please. Th
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 22:48, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>
> On 2019-11-19 11:37:04 +, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> > Even if you do that you're still requiring the user to parse syntax
> > according to esoteric rules.
>
> Oh, please. Those "esoteric rules" have been in wide-spread use for
> decades.
On 2019-11-19 11:37:04 +, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> Even if you do that you're still requiring the user to parse syntax
> according to esoteric rules.
Oh, please. Those "esoteric rules" have been in wide-spread use for
decades. If you look at any manual which tries to explain the syntax of
a pro
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:37:04AM +, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> It's bad enough that you have the inconsistency that REINDEX VERBOSE
> requires parentheses while the more recent REINDEX CONCURRENTLY does
> not (presumably to match the syntax of CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY),
> without insisting that
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 22:24, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>
> On 2019-11-18 12:24:40 +, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 11:46, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:27:24AM +0100, Josef Šimánek wrote:
> > > > This is clear once you understand what does it mean. I
On 2019-11-18 12:24:40 +, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 11:46, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:27:24AM +0100, Josef Šimánek wrote:
> > > This is clear once you understand what does it mean. I was aware of
> > > VERBOSE
> > > option of EXPLAIN and tried t
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 11:46, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:27:24AM +0100, Josef Šimánek wrote:
> > This is clear once you understand what does it mean. I was aware of VERBOSE
> > option of EXPLAIN and tried to use it without needed parentheses (the same
> > way EXPLAIN can u
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:27:24AM +0100, Josef Šimánek wrote:
> This is clear once you understand what does it mean. I was aware of VERBOSE
> option of EXPLAIN and tried to use it without needed parentheses (the same
> way EXPLAIN can understand it). In the parameter list of REINDEX, it is
> still
po 18. 11. 2019 v 7:42 odesílatel Michael Paquier
napsal:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 04:41:59AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Documentation patch is good idea.
>
> The documentation is rather clear about the need to of parenthesis
> when using the VERBOSE option, and that it is not a mandatory o
On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 04:41:59AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Documentation patch is good idea.
The documentation is rather clear about the need to of parenthesis
when using the VERBOSE option, and that it is not a mandatory option:
REINDEX [ ( VERBOSE ) ] { INDEX | TABLE | SCHEMA | DATABASE |
so 16. 11. 2019 v 18:43 odesílatel Josef Šimánek
napsal:
> Ahh, I just tried to do the same with reindexdb cli tool and the
> actual syntax is REINDEX (VERBOSE) TABLE sales; Sorry for unnecessary
> question. Anyway maybe we can add this to documentation as a example. I can
> prepare patch for thi
Ahh, I just tried to do the same with reindexdb cli tool and the
actual syntax is REINDEX (VERBOSE) TABLE sales; Sorry for unnecessary
question. Anyway maybe we can add this to documentation as a example. I can
prepare patch for this if welcomed.
so 16. 11. 2019 v 18:40 odesílatel Josef Šimánek
n
Hello,
according to https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/sql-reindex.html VERBOSE
option is valid for REINDEX command for 11.3 PostgreSQL server. Anyway I'm
getting error using VERBOSE option.
project_production=# REINDEX VERBOSE TABLE sales;
ERROR: syntax error at or near "VERBOSE"
LINE 1: REINDE
16 matches
Mail list logo