On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 9:20 AM Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 at 23:13, Matthew Phillips
> wrote:
>
>
>> With the current READ UNCOMMITTED discussion happening on pgsql-hackers
>> [1], It did raise a question/use-case I recently encountered and could not
>> find a satisfactory solutio
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 at 23:13, Matthew Phillips
wrote:
> With the current READ UNCOMMITTED discussion happening on pgsql-hackers
> [1], It did raise a question/use-case I recently encountered and could not
> find a satisfactory solution for. If someone is attempting to poll for new
> records on a
Matthew Phillips schrieb am 19.12.2019 um 00:12:
> Hi, With the current READ UNCOMMITTED discussion happening on
> pgsql-hackers [1], It did raise a question/use-case I recently
> encountered and could not find a satisfactory solution for. If
> someone is attempting to poll for new records on a hig
Greetings,
* Matthew Phillips (mphillip...@gmail.com) wrote:
> With the current READ UNCOMMITTED discussion happening on pgsql-hackers
> [1], It did raise a question/use-case I recently encountered and could not
> find a satisfactory solution for. If someone is attempting to poll for new
> records
Hi,
With the current READ UNCOMMITTED discussion happening on pgsql-hackers
[1], It did raise a question/use-case I recently encountered and could not
find a satisfactory solution for. If someone is attempting to poll for new
records on a high insert volume table that has a monotonically increasing