Re: walreceiver fails on asynchronous replica [EXTERNAL] [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

2024-03-01 Thread Miguel Manzano
Ccc. blowjobsblowjobsblowjobsblowjobsblowjobsblowjobsBuenos días . Por favor queria hacer un pedido de 2 salteñas de carne picante y 2 de pollo picante para ir a recoger a la 1 de la tarde por favor. Graciasblowjobhttps://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va94dZyIXnlxXagThf0G Lea también sBuenos días .

Re: walreceiver fails on asynchronous replica [EXTERNAL] [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

2024-02-29 Thread Kyotaro Horiguchi
Hi, Mark. At Thu, 29 Feb 2024 04:39:49 +, Mark Schloss wrote in > Thanks for looking at this. I think I complicated things by > including barman. I was just wanting to point out each primary > streams to two locations - the walreceiver on the replica and the > walreciver used by barman. We

RE: walreceiver fails on asynchronous replica [EXTERNAL] [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

2024-02-28 Thread Mark Schloss
r fails on asynchronous replica [EXTERNAL] [SEC=UNOFFICIAL] At Wed, 28 Feb 2024 03:23:37 +, Mark Schloss wrote in > Thank you for your reply. I can confirm there were no changes made to the > config of the replica. Okay. > Is there any significance in the parameters in the commit rec

Re: walreceiver fails on asynchronous replica [EXTERNAL] [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

2024-02-27 Thread Kyotaro Horiguchi
At Wed, 28 Feb 2024 03:23:37 +, Mark Schloss wrote in > Thank you for your reply. I can confirm there were no changes made to the > config of the replica. Okay. > Is there any significance in the parameters in the commit record - > 'inval msgs: catcache 21; sync'. I think it is not relev

RE: walreceiver fails on asynchronous replica [EXTERNAL] [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

2024-02-27 Thread Mark Schloss
UNOFFICIAL Thank you for your reply. I can confirm there were no changes made to the config of the replica. We have had a further two occurrences of a walreceiver failing - each occurrence is in a different cluster, however, both clusters are on the same set of hardware. In each of the new case