On 9/6/19 8:45 AM, Kevin Brannen wrote:
From: Adrian Klaver
On 9/5/19 5:05 PM, Kevin Brannen wrote:
It feels like the restore is adding the intarray extension, which does
a CREATE OPERATOR FAMILY on its own, then later the restore does
CREATE OPERATOR FAMILY on again causing the problem. Yet t
>From: Jerry Sievers
>
>
>Try running \dx+ for intarray on one of your deviant systems. You may find
>the item pg_dump is trying to be explicit about *missing* from the extension
>member list.
>
>In such a case, see the ALTER EXTENSION ADD... which can be run manually to
>register whatever is
Kevin Brannen writes:
>>From: Jerry Sievers
>>
>>>Kevin Brannen writes:
>>>
>>> It feels like the restore is adding the intarray extension, which does
>>> a CREATE OPERATOR FAMILY on its own, then later the restore does
>>> CREATE OPERATOR FAMILY on again causing the problem. Yet this doesn't
>
>From: Adrian Klaver
>On 9/5/19 5:05 PM, Kevin Brannen wrote:
>>
>> It feels like the restore is adding the intarray extension, which does
>> a CREATE OPERATOR FAMILY on its own, then later the restore does
>> CREATE OPERATOR FAMILY on again causing the problem. Yet this doesn't
>> happen on most
>From: Jerry Sievers
>
>>Kevin Brannen writes:
>>
>> It feels like the restore is adding the intarray extension, which does
>> a CREATE OPERATOR FAMILY on its own, then later the restore does
>> CREATE OPERATOR FAMILY on again causing the problem. Yet this doesn't
>> happen on most of our databas
Kevin Brannen writes:
>> On 9/5/19 4:24 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> > On 9/5/19 4:06 PM, Kevin Brannen wrote:
>> >>> From: Adrian Klaver
>> >>>
>> >>> On 9/5/19 2:57 PM, Kevin Brannen wrote:
>> I think I need some help to understand what’s going here because I
>> can’t figure it out an
On 9/5/19 5:05 PM, Kevin Brannen wrote:
On 9/5/19 4:24 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 9/5/19 4:06 PM, Kevin Brannen wrote:
From: Adrian Klaver
On 9/5/19 2:57 PM, Kevin Brannen wrote:
I think I need some help to understand what’s going here because I
can’t figure it out and google isn’t helping.
> On 9/5/19 4:24 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> > On 9/5/19 4:06 PM, Kevin Brannen wrote:
> >>> From: Adrian Klaver
> >>>
> >>> On 9/5/19 2:57 PM, Kevin Brannen wrote:
> I think I need some help to understand what’s going here because I
> can’t figure it out and google isn’t helping.
>
On 9/5/19 4:24 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 9/5/19 4:06 PM, Kevin Brannen wrote:
From: Adrian Klaver
On 9/5/19 2:57 PM, Kevin Brannen wrote:
I think I need some help to understand what’s going here because I
can’t figure it out and google isn’t helping.
This is for Pg 9.6.5. (Yes, we are upgr
On 9/5/19 4:06 PM, Kevin Brannen wrote:
From: Adrian Klaver
On 9/5/19 2:57 PM, Kevin Brannen wrote:
I think I need some help to understand what’s going here because I
can’t figure it out and google isn’t helping.
This is for Pg 9.6.5. (Yes, we are upgrading to 12.x in a few months,
or so the
> From: Adrian Klaver
>
> On 9/5/19 2:57 PM, Kevin Brannen wrote:
> > I think I need some help to understand what’s going here because I
> > can’t figure it out and google isn’t helping.
> >
> > This is for Pg 9.6.5. (Yes, we are upgrading to 12.x in a few months,
> > or so the plan is.) Pg code c
On 9/5/19 2:57 PM, Kevin Brannen wrote:
I think I need some help to understand what’s going here because I can’t
figure it out and google isn’t helping…
This is for Pg 9.6.5. (Yes, we are upgrading to 12.x in a few months, or
so the plan is.) Pg code came from the community and we compiled it
12 matches
Mail list logo
