Re: Replica on low-bandwitdh network

2017-12-05 Thread Ben Madin
I don't know if this is relevant, but we use the default streaming replication and were not always keeping up. Now we WAL log ship to S3 bucket... seems to work pretty well... cheers Ben On 5 December 2017 at 17:12, Job wrote: > Hi guys, > > we have some postgreswl 9.6.1 servers in two different

RE: Replica on low-bandwitdh network

2017-12-05 Thread Ahmed, Nawaz
You might as well try Slony. Best Regards, Nawaz Ahmed -Original Message- From: Job [mailto:j...@colliniconsulting.it] Sent: Tuesday, 5 December 2017 8:12 PM To: pgsql-gene...@postgresql.org Subject: Replica on low-bandwitdh network Hi guys, we have some postgreswl 9.6.1 servers in

Re: Replica on low-bandwitdh network

2017-12-05 Thread bricklen
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Job wrote: > we have some postgreswl 9.6.1 servers in two different continent. > Latency is from 180 to 250 ms between the two sites. > > Actually we use Rubyrep for off-site replication, since servers are > completely independent in case of connectivity loss. > >