a lot of data.
>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 16:23, Durgamahesh Manne
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 7:41 PM Igor Neyman wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>&g
ues are distributed very unevenly (say 99.9% has
>> false and 0.1% has true), you may get better results by excluding the
>> records with 'true' values (instead of including those that are
>> 'false'), for example by using a where not exists(...) subquery.
&
are
> 'false'), for example by using a where not exists(...) subquery.
>
> Obviously, that still won't help if you're just fetching a lot of data.
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 16:23, Durgamahesh Manne
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
&
postgr...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 10:04 AM
>> To: Igor Neyman
>> Subject: Re: Regrading brin_index on required column of the table
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 7:19 PM Igor Neyman wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Durgamahe
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 7:41 PM Igor Neyman wrote:
>
>
> *From:* Durgamahesh Manne [mailto:maheshpostgr...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 19, 2018 10:04 AM
> *To:* Igor Neyman
> *Subject:* Re: Regrading brin_index on required column of the table
>
> On Wed,
From: Durgamahesh Manne [mailto:maheshpostgr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 9:43 AM
To: PostgreSQL mailing lists
Subject: Regrading brin_index on required column of the table
WARNING: This email originated from outside of Perceptron! Please be mindful of
PHISHING and MALWARE
