>From the original post
"-This whole system will uphold any precision, certainly ones within a very
large range limit, controlled by the already available type for large
positive integers, the BIGINT. It can thereby enumerate digits within the
range of
(+/-)1 to (+/-)9,223,372,036,854,775,807. This
On 6/26/22 09:15, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
On top of that OP has already received a lot of answers in the past, it's just
that since no one wants to take care of a whole non trivial project for free
the answer is never what OP wants.
On top of that, most of the functionality can be obtained by usi
On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 01:22:49PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-06-26 at 10:37 +, A Z wrote:
> > I have successfully sent an (updated) email list message to
> >
> > pgsql-hack...@lists.postgresql.org
> >
> > which can be viewed in the archive here:
> >
> > https://www.postgresq
On Sun, 2022-06-26 at 10:37 +, A Z wrote:
> I have successfully sent an (updated) email list message to
>
> pgsql-hack...@lists.postgresql.org
>
> which can be viewed in the archive here:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Rm7WBtZZpYL1NWuunuN_16EY0JcyejqV22z_JlUfvD5FYPenGDd_ZGUddwAcM
Dear pgsql-general,
I have successfully sent an (updated) email list message to
pgsql-hack...@lists.postgresql.org
which can be viewed in the archive here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Rm7WBtZZpYL1NWuunuN_16EY0JcyejqV22z_JlUfvD5FYPenGDd_ZGUddwAcMNi2KNSyvqAhBRzj2JxtJoNmWAzykBQU4Z1AzBp0G
