Ok,
Then what will increase the size of the WAL?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 17-Mar-2022, at 8:08 PM, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-03-17 at 14:05 +, Shukla, Pranjal wrote:
>> From the configuration we have, does it mean that the primary will retain 32
>> WAL's
>> of 1 GB each and then s
Hi Laurenze,
From the configuration we have, does it mean that the primary will retain 32
WAL's of 1 GB each and then start evicting the first WAL as soon as the last
one gets filled? In layman's term, 32GB is huge amount of data and I don't
think that much changes during upgrades. In fact the t
On Thu, 2022-03-17 at 14:05 +, Shukla, Pranjal wrote:
> From the configuration we have, does it mean that the primary will retain 32
> WAL's
> of 1 GB each and then start evicting the first WAL as soon as the last one
> gets filled?
> In layman's term, 32GB is huge amount of data and I don't
On Thu, 2022-03-17 at 12:36 +, Shukla, Pranjal wrote:
> uring upgrades of our application, we generally shutdown all Secondary servers
> which are getting stream replicated from Primary Servers. This is to maintain
> a copy of database on other servers should
> we wish to revert (of course we t
During upgrades of our application, we generally shutdown all Secondary servers
which are getting stream replicated from Primary Servers. This is to maintain a
copy of database on other servers should we wish to revert (of course we take
DB Backups too before starting the activity). After the ap
