Aw: Re: Q: documentation improvement re collation version mismatch

2022-11-10 Thread Karsten Hilbert
> > The comment above the query in the official documentation is rather > > assertive > > (even if may true to the letter) and may warrant some more cautionary > > wording ? Added, perhaps, some variation of this: > > > > > For now, the only safe way to go is either reindex everything, or > > >

Re: Q: documentation improvement re collation version mismatch

2022-11-10 Thread Julien Rouhaud
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 08:39:03AM -0600, Ron wrote: > On 11/10/22 08:33, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 08:04:37AM -0600, Ron wrote: > > > On 11/10/22 02:33, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > For now, the only safe way to go is either reindex everything, or > > > > eve

Re: Q: documentation improvement re collation version mismatch

2022-11-10 Thread Ron
On 11/10/22 08:33, Julien Rouhaud wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 08:04:37AM -0600, Ron wrote: On 11/10/22 02:33, Julien Rouhaud wrote: [snip] For now, the only safe way to go is either reindex everything, or everything except some safe cases (non-partial indexes on plain-non-collatable datatype

Re: Q: documentation improvement re collation version mismatch

2022-11-10 Thread Julien Rouhaud
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 08:04:37AM -0600, Ron wrote: > On 11/10/22 02:33, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > [snip] > > For now, the only safe way to go is either reindex everything, or everything > > except some safe cases (non-partial indexes on plain-non-collatable > > datatypes > > only). Usually, those

Re: Q: documentation improvement re collation version mismatch

2022-11-10 Thread Ron
On 11/10/22 02:33, Julien Rouhaud wrote: [snip] For now, the only safe way to go is either reindex everything, or everything except some safe cases (non-partial indexes on plain-non-collatable datatypes only). Usually, those safe cases are usually enough to avoid most of useless reindex activity

Re: Q: documentation improvement re collation version mismatch

2022-11-10 Thread Julien Rouhaud
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 11:47:01AM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > Thanks, Julien, for your explanation. > > > > regarding changed collation versions this > > > > > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/sql-altercollation.html > > > > > > says: > > > > > > The following query can be used to

Aw: Re: Q: documentation improvement re collation version mismatch

2022-11-10 Thread Karsten Hilbert
Thanks, Julien, for your explanation. > > regarding changed collation versions this > > > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/sql-altercollation.html > > > > says: > > > > The following query can be used to identify all > > collations in the current database that need to be > >

Re: Q: documentation improvement re collation version mismatch

2022-11-10 Thread Julien Rouhaud
Hi, On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 12:45:17PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > Dear all, > > regarding changed collation versions this > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/sql-altercollation.html > > says: > > The following query can be used to identify all > collations in the curre

Q: documentation improvement re collation version mismatch

2022-11-09 Thread Karsten Hilbert
Dear all, regarding changed collation versions this https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/sql-altercollation.html says: The following query can be used to identify all collations in the current database that need to be refreshed and the objects that depend on the