On Thursday, February 11, 2021, Steve Baldwin
wrote:
> David, from what I can see of the docs, for 9.6 it is PROCEDURE. It seems
> FUNCTION didn't appear until 11.
>
Indeed. I didn’t pay attention to the version.
David J.
David, from what I can see of the docs, for 9.6 it is PROCEDURE. It seems
FUNCTION didn't appear until 11.
Steve
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 7:05 AM David G. Johnston <
david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thursday, February 11, 2021, Steve Baldwin
> wrote:
>
>> Try ... EXECUTE PROCEDURE cust
On Thursday, February 11, 2021, Steve Baldwin
wrote:
> Try ... EXECUTE PROCEDURE customer_num_informix()
>
FUNCTION, not PROCEDURE
David J.
FWIW, messing with serial numbers like this is pretty risky.Sequences have
transactional semantics for a reason.
Dave Cramer
www.postgres.rocks
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 14:57, Steve Baldwin wrote:
> Try ... EXECUTE PROCEDURE customer_num_informix()
>
> Steve
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 6:47 AM J
Try ... EXECUTE PROCEDURE customer_num_informix()
Steve
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 6:47 AM James B. Byrne
wrote:
> I am trying to implement a trigger in a PostgreSQL-9.6.17 database:
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION customer_num_informix()
> RETURNS trigger AS $$
> BEGIN
> -- An Aubit/Informix 4
I am trying to implement a trigger in a PostgreSQL-9.6.17 database:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION customer_num_informix()
RETURNS trigger AS $$
BEGIN
-- An Aubit/Informix 4GL INSERT statement passes the value 0 to Informix
-- DBMS for columns that have the SERIAL data type. Informix will then