Re: PGSQL 10, many Random named DB

2018-01-25 Thread Merlin Moncure
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 3:38 AM, Durumdara wrote: > Dear Members! > > Thank you for the suggestions. > Yes, the sysadmin allowed incoming connections from net. > We will check your list when we are there. Don't bother. We have a confirmed attack, time to take immediate remediation. 1. Disconnec

Re: PGSQL 10, many Random named DB

2018-01-25 Thread Laurenz Albe
Durumdara wrote: > Somewhere the system administrator (who don't know the PG really) installed a > PGSQL server (10.x) with a database. > He couldn't manage the server well. > > Yesterday my colleague saw 21 databases in this server with random names. > He checked it with built in PGAdmin IV. > T

Re: PGSQL 10, many Random named DB

2018-01-25 Thread Durumdara
Dear Members! Thank you for the suggestions. Yes, the sysadmin allowed incoming connections from net. We will check your list when we are there. Thank you again! Best wishes dd

Re: PGSQL 10, many Random named DB

2018-01-24 Thread Melvin Davidson
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Rob Sargent wrote: > > > On 01/24/2018 10:22 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:52 AM, Durumdara wrote: >> >>> Hello! >>> >>> Somewhere the system administrator (who don't know the PG really) >>> installed >>> a PGSQL server (10.x) with a d

Re: PGSQL 10, many Random named DB

2018-01-24 Thread Rob Sargent
On 01/24/2018 10:22 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote: On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:52 AM, Durumdara wrote: Hello! Somewhere the system administrator (who don't know the PG really) installed a PGSQL server (10.x) with a database. He couldn't manage the server well. Yesterday my colleague saw 21 databas

Re: PGSQL 10, many Random named DB

2018-01-24 Thread Merlin Moncure
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:52 AM, Durumdara wrote: > Hello! > > Somewhere the system administrator (who don't know the PG really) installed > a PGSQL server (10.x) with a database. > He couldn't manage the server well. > > Yesterday my colleague saw 21 databases in this server with random names. >

Re: PGSQL 10, many Random named DB

2018-01-24 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 01/24/2018 02:52 AM, Durumdara wrote: Hello! Somewhere the system administrator (who don't know the PG really) installed a PGSQL server (10.x) with a database. He couldn't manage the server well. Yesterday my colleague saw 21 databases in this server with random names. He checked it with b

Re: PGSQL 10, many Random named DB

2018-01-24 Thread Vincenzo Romano
2018-01-24 12:18 GMT+01:00 Condor : > On 24-01-2018 12:52, Durumdara wrote: >> >> Hello! >> >> Somewhere the system administrator (who don't know the PG really) >> installed a PGSQL server (10.x) with a database. >> He couldn't manage the server well. >> >> Yesterday my colleague saw 21 databases i

Re: PGSQL 10, many Random named DB

2018-01-24 Thread Condor
On 24-01-2018 12:52, Durumdara wrote: Hello! Somewhere the system administrator (who don't know the PG really) installed a PGSQL server (10.x) with a database. He couldn't manage the server well. Yesterday my colleague saw 21 databases in this server with random names. He checked it with built

Re: PGSQL 10, many Random named DB

2018-01-24 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
> 1.) PGAdmin IV bug? > 2.) Their server is hacked/cracked from outside? > 3.) A wrong configured tool, or an automation? > 4.) "Alien invasion", etc. > Did you see same thing anywhere? Are their connections to the server?  What does "netstat" tell you? -- Meetings Coordinator, Michigan Associat

PGSQL 10, many Random named DB

2018-01-24 Thread Durumdara
Hello! Somewhere the system administrator (who don't know the PG really) installed a PGSQL server (10.x) with a database. He couldn't manage the server well. Yesterday my colleague saw 21 databases in this server with random names. He checked it with built in PGAdmin IV. Today we checked it again