Greetings,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 12:58 Marc wrote:
> On 29 Mar 2022, at 17:17, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
>- Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org) wrote:
>
> On 2022-Mar-22, Shukla, Pranjal wrote:
>
> Are there any disadvantages of increasing the “wal_keep_segments” to a
> hi
On 29 Mar 2022, at 17:17, Stephen Frost wrote:
Greetings,
* Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org) wrote:
On 2022-Mar-22, Shukla, Pranjal wrote:
Are there any disadvantages of increasing the
“wal_keep_segments” to a
higher number say, 500? Will it have any impact on performance of
streamin
Greetings,
* Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org) wrote:
> On 2022-Mar-22, Shukla, Pranjal wrote:
> > Are there any disadvantages of increasing the “wal_keep_segments” to a
> > higher number say, 500? Will it have any impact on performance of
> > streaming replication, on primary or secondary
On 2022-Mar-22, Shukla, Pranjal wrote:
> Team,
> Are there any disadvantages of increasing the “wal_keep_segments” to a
> higher number say, 500? Will it have any impact on performance of
> streaming replication, on primary or secondary servers?
No. It just means WAL will occupy more disk space.
Team,
Are there any disadvantages of increasing the “wal_keep_segments” to a higher
number say, 500? Will it have any impact on performance of streaming
replication, on primary or secondary servers?
Thanks & Regards
Pranjal Shukla
