On 3/17/20 8:57 AM, Björn Lundin wrote:
I am still not sure that this can be marked solved. I am trying to
figure out how running a different version of psql once can affect
another version of psql. That would seem to imply psql changed
something on the server and AFAIK sorting/ordering is
>
> I am still not sure that this can be marked solved. I am trying to figure out
> how running a different version of psql once can affect another version of
> psql. That would seem to imply psql changed something on the server and AFAIK
> sorting/ordering is done by the server not the clien
On 3/17/20 12:28 AM, Björn Lundin wrote:
So insert is
bnl@ibm2:~/db$ psql
Tidtagning är på.
AUTOCOMMIT off
psql (9.6.15, server 9.4.15)
Skriv "help" för hjälp.
Except you are using psql 9.6.15 against a 9.4.15 server.
What happens if you use psql(9.4.15) to do sort query against 9.4.15
se
17 mars 2020 kl. 15:05 skrev Tom Lane :
>
> =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Lundin?= writes:
>>> What happens if you use psql(9.4.15) to do sort query against 9.4.15 server?
>
>> However AFTER I checked the bad sorting - sep/oct 2016 and early apr 2017
>> With psql 9.4 I connected with psql 9.6 again.
>>
=?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Lundin?= writes:
>> What happens if you use psql(9.4.15) to do sort query against 9.4.15 server?
> However AFTER I checked the bad sorting - sep/oct 2016 and early apr 2017
> With psql 9.4 I connected with psql 9.6 again.
> And now the sorting error is gone her too!
Boy ..
>> So insert is
>> bnl@ibm2:~/db$ psql
>> Tidtagning är på.
>> AUTOCOMMIT off
>> psql (9.6.15, server 9.4.15)
>> Skriv "help" för hjälp.
>
> Except you are using psql 9.6.15 against a 9.4.15 server.
>
> What happens if you use psql(9.4.15) to do sort query against 9.4.15 server?
So this is mo
