Re: Memory footprint diff between 9.5 and 12

On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 11:39 PM Laurenz Albe wrote: > On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 13:33 -0700, Tory M Blue wrote: > > I hadn't noticed this until today, but a running 9.5 system with buffers > at 10GB starts > > and has been running years without issues. (15GB available) > > > > Postgres 12 will not st

Re: Memory footprint diff between 9.5 and 12

On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 13:33 -0700, Tory M Blue wrote: > I hadn't noticed this until today, but a running 9.5 system with buffers at > 10GB starts > and has been running years without issues. (15GB available) > > Postgres 12 will not start with that configuration, complaining about memory > avail

Re: Memory footprint diff between 9.5 and 12

On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 13:33 -0700, Tory M Blue wrote: > I hadn't noticed this until today, but a running 9.5 system with > buffers at 10GB starts and has been running years without issues. > (15GB available) > Postgres 12 will not start with that configuration, complaining about > memory availabili

Memory footprint diff between 9.5 and 12

I hadn't noticed this until today, but a running 9.5 system with buffers at 10GB starts and has been running years without issues. (15GB available) Postgres 12 will not start with that configuration, complaining about memory availability. So Postgres12 won't start until shared buffers is 6GB, but