Re: Logical decoding on standby

Am 13.03.2018 um 02:40 schrieb Andres Freund: The subject said logical decoding, not replication. There's a lot of change data capture type workloads where decoding from the standby is quite useful. And the design definitely would work for that, we've explicitly took that into consideration.

Re: Logical decoding on standby

Hi, On 2018-03-13 01:08:03 +0100, Andreas Kretschmer wrote: > On 13 March 2018 00:58:27 CET, Andreas Kretschmer > wrote: > >On 12 March 2018 21:18:22 CET, Andreas Joseph Krogh > > wrote: > >>Anybody knows if $subject will make it into v11? I can't see it happening for v11, there's not even a CF

Sv: Re: Logical decoding on standby

På tirsdag 13. mars 2018 kl. 01:08:03, skrev Andreas Kretschmer < andr...@a-kretschmer.de >: On 13 March 2018 00:58:27 CET, Andreas Kretschmer wrote: >On 12 March 2018 21:18:22 CET, Andreas Joseph Krogh > wrote: >>Anybody knows if $subject will make it into v11?

Re: Logical decoding on standby

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Andreas Kretschmer wrote: > Let me explain my question. One of the key aspects of logical replication > is, that you can define what to replicate. That wouldn't work in this way, > that's why i'm asking. One of the key aspects of "standby" is that it is ready to

Re: Logical decoding on standby

On 13 March 2018 00:58:27 CET, Andreas Kretschmer wrote: >On 12 March 2018 21:18:22 CET, Andreas Joseph Krogh > wrote: >>Anybody knows if $subject will make it into v11? >>  >>-- >>Andreas Joseph Krogh > >Why do you think you needs this? > >Regards, Andreas Let me explain my question. One of th

Re: Logical decoding on standby

On 12 March 2018 21:18:22 CET, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: >Anybody knows if $subject will make it into v11? >  >-- >Andreas Joseph Krogh Why do you think you needs this? Regards, Andreas -- 2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company

Logical decoding on standby

Anybody knows if $subject will make it into v11?   -- Andreas Joseph Krogh