Re: Erroneous behavior of primary key

2018-08-29 Thread Daniel J Peacock
As a further update on this, we dropped the offending PKs, removed the duplicated rows using delete from where ctid in (select max(ctid) from group by having count(*) > 1), and then rebuilt the primary key. Thus far, we've seen no further corruption. We were wondering if it was a restore corru

Re: Erroneous behavior of primary key

2018-08-29 Thread Daniel J Peacock
Copying the list this time. On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 7:54 AM Daniel J Peacock wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 7:14 PM David Rowley > wrote: > >> On 28 August 2018 at 07:50, Daniel J Peacock >> wrote: >> > I've got an odd situation with a table that has a varchar(255) as the >> > primary ke

Re: Erroneous behavior of primary key

2018-08-27 Thread David Rowley
On 28 August 2018 at 07:50, Daniel J Peacock wrote: > I've got an odd situation with a table that has a varchar(255) as the > primary key that is getting key values from an Elasticsearch engine. What > I'm finding is that even though there is a primary key on the table, I am > getting duplicated

Re: Erroneous behavior of primary key

2018-08-27 Thread Rob Sargent
> On Aug 27, 2018, at 1:50 PM, Daniel J Peacock wrote: > > Good afternoon, all. > I've got an odd situation with a table that has a varchar(255) as the primary > key that is getting key values from an Elasticsearch engine. What I'm > finding is that even though there is a primary key on the

Erroneous behavior of primary key

2018-08-27 Thread Daniel J Peacock
Good afternoon, all. I've got an odd situation with a table that has a varchar(255) as the primary key that is getting key values from an Elasticsearch engine. What I'm finding is that even though there is a primary key on the table, I am getting duplicated keys in the data and the constraint is n