On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 10:07:03PM -0500, Craig McIlwee wrote:
>
> (replying to the entire list instead of Bruce only this time...)
>
>
>
> This doesn't make sense to me. Since we hard-linked, why would 12 be so
> much smaller? If it was symlinks, I could imaging that, but it doesn't
(replying to the entire list instead of Bruce only this time...)
> This doesn't make sense to me. Since we hard-linked, why would 12 be so
> much smaller? If it was symlinks, I could imaging that, but it doesn't
> use symlinks, just hard links, so it should be similar. Please look at
> the siz
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 11:25:11PM +, Simon Windsor wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have upgraded many Pg databases from 9 to 10 to 11 using the Ubuntu
> pg_upgradecluster command (wrapper to pg_update) without issues, however today
> I upgraded a DB from 11 to 12.
>
> Using the syntax
>
> pg_upgradecluse
Hi
I have upgraded many Pg databases from 9 to 10 to 11 using the Ubuntu
pg_upgradecluster command (wrapper to pg_update) without issues, however
today I upgraded a DB from 11 to 12.
Using the syntax
*/pg_upgradecluser -k -m upgrade 11 main/*
using the latest 12.5 binaries all appeared to w
