On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:44 AM, ERR ORR wrote:
> [ clear attempt at trolling ]
>
>
This sort of verbiage has never been considered acceptable on the
PostgreSQL lists. Since the CoC is not yet in effect, it falls on the core
team to enforce community norms. Be advised that if you post something
On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 at 12:11, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
> On 27/06/18 10:44, ERR ORR wrote:
[snip moronic ranting]
> Is someone running unit tests on the CoC? :-)
LOL.
More like false-flagging, IMO.
Geoff
On 27/06/18 10:44, ERR ORR wrote:
I am apparently late in this discussion.
I COMPLETELY DISAGREE with the idea of having a CoC in Postgres.
I've participated for many years in the lists and don't remember one
instance of inappropriate behavior.
A CoC will only contribute to decrease the quality
I am apparently late in this discussion.
I COMPLETELY DISAGREE with the idea of having a CoC in Postgres.
I've participated for many years in the lists and don't remember one
instance of inappropriate behavior.
A CoC will only contribute to decrease the quality of the Postgres code.
How? It will en
The proposed Postgres Code of Conduct [1] calls for an investigation
and enforcement committee, which is to be appointed by and ultimately
answerable to the core team, though no core members may sit on it.
The core team is pleased to announce that Stacey Haysler has agreed
to serve as the first Ch
