Sorry, my wrong settings on pc mail client.
Sorry again.
Agharta
Il ven 28 giu 2024, 19:51 Richard Welty ha scritto:
> not really in direct response to this conversation, but is there any reason
> on the face of the planet why read receipts need to be sent to every single
> recipient of the mail
not really in direct response to this conversation, but is there any reason
on the face of the planet why read receipts need to be sent to every single
recipient of the mailing list?
just saying,
richard
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 03:20:26 -0400 wrote ---
HOO-HA! This is HUGE!
On
HOO-HA! This is HUGE!
Only 2.2 seconds on my data Amazing!
distinct on (field) *followed by "*" *is a hidden gem!
Thank you so much and thanks to everyone who helped me! Thank you very
much!!
Cheers,
Agharta
Il 27/06/24 6:16 PM, David Rowley ha scritto:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024, 3:20
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024, 3:20 am aghart...@gmail.com,
wrote:
>
> Now the query:
> explain (verbose, buffers, analyze)
> with last_table_ids as materialized(
>select xx from (
>select LAST_VALUE(pk_id) over (partition by integer_field_2 order by
> datetime_field_1 RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECE
Hi,
Thanks for you reply.
About syntax you're right, but I couldn't think of anything better :(((
I'm here for that too, to solve the problem in a fancy way, with your
great support.
In practice, I need to get back a dataset with the last association (the
most datatime recent record) for a
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 11:33 AM aghart...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You are right. Too quickly copy-paste on my part :-)
>
> I take this opportunity to add a NOT insignificant detail.
>
> Before executing the select query I clear the cache:
>
> systemctl stop postgresql-16 && sync && echo 3 > /
On Thursday, June 27, 2024, aghart...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Now the query:
> explain (verbose, buffers, analyze)
> with last_table_ids as materialized(
> select xx from (
> select LAST_VALUE(pk_id) over (partition by integer_field_2 order by
> datetime_field_1 RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING
Hi,
You are right. Too quickly copy-paste on my part :-)
I take this opportunity to add a NOT insignificant detail.
Before executing the select query I clear the cache:
systemctl stop postgresql-16 && sync && echo 3 >
/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches && systemctl start postgresql-16
I need to get
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 11:20 AM aghart...@gmail.com
wrote:
[snip]
> -- insert 4M records
> insert into test_table(pk_id) select generate_series(1,400,1);
>
> -- now set some random data, distribuited between specific ranges (as in
> my production table)
> update test_table set
> datetime_fie
Hello everyone,
Sorry to bother you but I have a query that is driving me crazy.
I need to have the last valid record at a temporal level according to a
specific parameter.
First some data:
Linux Rocky 8.10 environment, minimal installation (on VM KVM with
Fedora 40).
Postgresql 16.3, instal
10 matches
Mail list logo