avel │ 0 bytes │ this is a table comment │
> └┴┴───┴───┴─┴─┘
> (1 row)
>
I was so close! That works; thank you very much for your help, Pavel.
--
Mark Jeffcoat
Austin, TX
'test_table');
objoid | classoid | objsubid | description
+--+--+-
714760 | 1259 | 0 | this is a table comment
(1 row)
--
Mark Jeffcoat
Austin, TX
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Mark Jeffcoat writes:
> > I would have claimed before seeing this example that it wasn't even
> > grammatical; I thought the only legal place to write the ON clause was
> > immediately after the JOIN. Appar
ion_a.id_v = relation_b.id_v);
I would have claimed before seeing this example that it wasn't even
grammatical; I thought the only legal place to write the ON clause was
immediately after the JOIN. Apparently not.
How should I read this query? I'd appreciate any help understanding this.
--
Mark Jeffcoat
Austin, TX
