Hmmm I usually don't participate in forums and accidentally sent my reply
to David Gauthier directly. This issue sounds interesting I'll give it
another try and send the reply to the group.
>From my simple, engineering hat perspective I feel this question is
difficult to answer without hard num
Vick,
I would love to use ZFS, this project requires RHEL/SeLinux MLS. Without
MLS and RH support, ZFS is a no-go.
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Vick Khera wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Gary M wrote:
>
>> Thanks Josh,
>>
>> PITR is the option I w
Thanks everyone !!
I think I have enough alternatives for this project. I'll start testing on
Monday..
have a good weekend
-g
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 12:55 PM, David Steele wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> On 3/2/18 2:05 PM, Gary M wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have an unus
Thanks Josh,
PITR is the option I was recommending. Project management diligence
dictates I need at least one other option from a different recommending
source, two other options optimally.
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Joshua D. Drake
wrote:
> On 03/02/2018 11:05 AM, Gary M wrote:
>
Hi,
I have an unusual requirement for schema based, live backup of a 24/7
database processing 100K inserts/updates per hour. The data store is around
100TB.
The requirement is supporting an incremental backup of 10 minute windows.
Replication is not considered backup from malicious action.
Are t
