I may be off-topic as I've only worked occasionally with ORA but still know
it good enough.
What I miss most of the Oracle DB in PostgreSQL is the elaborate system of
object security and granting permissions which exists in Oracle DB.
What I like most about the Postgres DB is that lots of plugins/e
I'm trying to migrate a 9.5 DB to a current version using PG_DUMPALL.
It reclaims that what I pass in the -d parameter is missing a "=" and the
man directs me to look at chapter 31.1.1 Connection Strings of the dox PDF.
The Problem is that there are different connection strings listed there and
I d
I was never consulted.
I was only Told that there was a CoC "to be". Not when, not how.
A CoC will inevitably lead to the project taken over by leftists, political
and technical decisions will be made by others.
Most important from my PoV, the projects quality will decrease until its
made unviable.
I see a CoC as an infiltration of the PostgreSQL community which has worked
OK since at least 10 years.
The project owners have let their care slacken.
I request that the project owners EXPEL/EXCOMMUNICATE ALL those who are
advancing what can only be seen as an instrument for harassing members of a
I am apparently late in this discussion.
I COMPLETELY DISAGREE with the idea of having a CoC in Postgres.
I've participated for many years in the lists and don't remember one
instance of inappropriate behavior.
A CoC will only contribute to decrease the quality of the Postgres code.
How? It will en
