On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 11:35 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Thanks for the test case! A quick "git bisect" says I broke it at
> > cb8e50a4a09fe541e32cd54ea90a97f2924121a1 is the first bad commit
> > commit cb8e50a4a09fe541e32cd54ea90a97f2924121a1
> > Author: Tom Lane
> > Date: Fri Aug 30
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 5:15 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Bertrand Mamasam writes:
> > I get this error in PG16.5, 16.6 and 17 :
> > wrong varnullingrels (b 3) (expected (b)) for Var 1/19
>
> Please provide a self-contained test case. A fragmentary query
> with no underlyi
Hello,
My query has been working fine in 16.4 and before, but not anymore in 16.5,
16.6 and 17. It is a query with multiple CTE, some of which are using
values of the previous ones, and the end of the query sort of make a mix of
found values with aggregation from a LATERAL JOIN. Something like thi
Le ven. 10 févr. 2023, 03:20, Chris a écrit :
> Hello list
>
> I'm pondering migrating an FTS application from Solr to Postgres, just
> because we use Postgres for everything else.
>
> The application is basically fgrep with a web frontend. However the
> indexed documents are very computer networ
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 8:57 AM Hemil Ruparel
wrote:
> I used uuid4 for customer ids because i needed to interface with payment
> providers. Is that wrong? All other places except transaction ids, i have
> used serial ints
>
> On Fri 2 Apr, 2021, 8:56 AM Rob Sargent, wrote:
>
>> On 4/1/21 8:28 PM
