Le 17/01/2020 à 19:07, Laurenz Albe a écrit :
On Fri, 2020-01-17 at 08:43 +0100, Arnaud L. wrote:
> > is it OK to set wal_level to minimal on the subscriber side of the
> > logical replication ?
>
> Yes, if you don't want physical backups.
You mean online physical
Le 16/01/2020 à 19:58, Laurenz Albe a écrit :
On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 12:09 +0100, Arnaud L. wrote:
is it OK to set wal_level to minimal on the subscriber side of the
logical replication ?
Yes, if you don't want physical backups.
You mean online physical backups ?
I could still shutdow
Hi list,
is it OK to set wal_level to minimal on the subscriber side of the
logical replication ?
Thanks !
Regards
--
Arnaud
Le 08/10/2019 à 16:59, Arnaud L. a écrit :
Yes, I already did that, and unfortunately there's no activy.
There is absolutely no activity in procmon using psql.exe as a filter.
process-xp is not giving more information, processor usage is 0%.
My apologies, I obviously did something wrong
Le 08/10/2019 à 16:55, Daniel Verite a écrit :
Arnaud L. wrote:
Anyway, it hung using this syntax during last night's run.
I'll give it another try tonight just to be sure.
When psql.exe is hanging, maybe you could use a tool like
Process Monitor [1] or Process Explorer
Le 08/10/2019 à 16:03, Adrian Klaver a écrit :
This is going to be hard to troubleshoot if you change your commands.
Previously you had:
psql -h %MYPGSERVER% -a -f myscript.sql %MYPGDB%
Changing more then one thing at a time makes it that much more difficult
to isolate the issue.
Yes, true. A
Le 08/10/2019 à 12:55, Daniel Verite a écrit :
Testing this with 11.5, it works for me.
Make sure you're running the latest minor release (on the client
side in this case), because a related fix was issued last February.
For the 11 branch it was in version 11.2.
OK, my bad, backslashes in a win
Le 08/10/2019 à 12:55, Daniel Verite a écrit :
Arnaud L. wrote:
As a side note, COPY (...) TO STDOUT \g 'somefile' does not work in a
script file (i.e. it does not work if the command is passed in a file
via the -f argument).
The command runs fine, no error is raised eit
Le 08/10/2019 à 09:28, Pavel Stehule a écrit :
you can write simple C application with COPY API
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/libpq-copy.html
Unfortunately, I don't know C.
Then you can eliminate or ensure locality of problem.
more, you can use server side copy. Superuser can read data
Le 07/10/2019 à 16:36, Adrian Klaver a écrit :
So you are saying that you have not run the problematic line by itself?
It hung during last night's run.
I had modified my batch script to run the \copy commands separately,
i.e. it now reads as :
psql -h myserver -a mydb < originalscriptwithout
Le 07/10/2019 à 16:36, Adrian Klaver a écrit :
So you are saying that you have not run the problematic line by itself?
It depends what you mean by that.
I've run this line by itself many times. Everytime the script has failed
in fact.
But until today I had not splitted the batch script to call
Le 04/10/2019 à 19:08, Adrian Klaver a écrit :
On 10/4/19 12:19 AM, Arnaud L. wrote:
OK I can do that. I thought I nailed it down to this line because it
started failing when this line was ~5th in the script, and it kept
failing on that very same line after I moved it at the very end of the
Le 03/10/2019 à 16:32, Adrian Klaver a écrit :
I may have missed it before, but where is the Postgres server located?
On the same local area network. Not on the computer running the script
(so direct COPY TO is not an option).
Given that this seems to be some sort of resource issue and th
Le 03/10/2019 à 15:54, Adrian Klaver a écrit :
On 10/2/19 11:51 PM, Arnaud L. wrote:
Well, this problem is still bugging me, and this time I've tried with a
local file. Unfortunately, it did not help.
To further rule out filesystem problems, I first took care to delete the
target files b
Hi list,
Le 28/08/2019 à 09:43, Luca Ferrari a écrit :
I don't want to be pedantic, but I would have tried with a single change at a
time.
And my bet is: the local file would do the trick (i.e., it is a weird share
problem).
Well, this problem is still bugging me, and this time I've tried wi
Le 03/09/2019 à 15:43, Tom Lane a écrit :
"Arnaud L." writes:
-> Bitmap Index Scan on planet_osm_ways_nodes_idx
(cost=0.00..11190.36 rows=1420982 width=0) (actual time=0.268..0.268
rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: (nodes && '{1}'::bigint[])
The plan
Le 04/09/2019 à 09:04, Arnaud L. a écrit :
Le 03/09/2019 à 15:43, Tom Lane a écrit :
The planner should be able to do better than that, given up-to-date
statistics on the "nodes" column.
Tom, I can confirm that with up to date statistics the planner is still
lost.
I did a REINDEX t
Le 04/09/2019 à 09:04, Arnaud L. a écrit :
Tom, I can confirm that with up to date statistics the planner is still
lost.
I did a REINDEX to rule out a broken index and the estimate is still in
the 100k+ range.
Sorry, I meant 1M+ range.
EXPLAIN ANALYZE select id from planet_osm_ways WHERE
Le 03/09/2019 à 15:43, Tom Lane a écrit :
"Arnaud L." writes:
We have upgraded our database from 9.6 to 11 (and updated PostGIS from
2.3 to 2.5 as well).
...
Have you re-ANALYZEd the database? The problem with this query
seems to be the spectacularly awful rowcount est
Le 03/09/2019 à 17:02, Imre Samu a écrit :
> We have upgraded our database from 9.6 to 11
This is now the latest PG ? PG11.5?
Yes, PostgreSQL 11.5, compiled by Visual C++ build 1914, 64-bit.
- the osm2pgsql has an own parallelizations ... ( osm2pgsql
--number-processes .. )
so be c
Le 03/09/2019 à 16:39, Paul Ramsey a écrit :
On Sep 3, 2019, at 7:06 AM, Arnaud L. wrote:
I've setup parallel_tuple_cost to 1.0 parallel_setup_cost to 5000.0 for the
time being which solves this specific problem. These value don't look very
sensible though, they are very high compa
Le 03/09/2019 à 15:43, Tom Lane a écrit :
"Arnaud L." writes:
We have upgraded our database from 9.6 to 11 (and updated PostGIS from
2.3 to 2.5 as well).
...
Have you re-ANALYZEd the database? The problem with this query
seems to be the spectacularly awful rowcount estimate h
Hi list
We have upgraded our database from 9.6 to 11 (and updated PostGIS from
2.3 to 2.5 as well).
We are using it among other things to store an OpenStreetMap database,
populated by the osm2pgsql program and updated on a daily basis.
The process used to take ~1h30 minutes before the upgrade
Le 28/08/2019 à 09:43, Luca Ferrari a écrit :
I don't want to be pedantic, but I would have tried with a single
change at a time.
And my bet is: the local file would do the trick (i.e., it is a weird
share problem).
You're not don't worry. This process is quite important in our workflow
(not c
Le 27/08/2019 à 13:17, Arnaud L. a écrit :
I move the offending line at the end of the script, so it will run some
minutes later, maybe this will be enough.
OK, so this was enough for last night's schedule to run without problem.
I still don't get it so I'm not satisfied wit
Le 27/08/2019 à 13:13, Luca Ferrari a écrit :
My personal experience with shares and network that are not so much
stable is that they can block, and that is why I'm suggesting to try
on the local filesystem to see if that is a share-related problem or a
resource problem. Also scheduling the scrip
Le 27/08/2019 à 10:57, Luca Ferrari a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:48 AM Arnaud L. wrote:
I can run the script just fine during working hours.
I meant thru your scheduler (cron or something).
Yes, it runs fine too. There is indeed something happening on the server
at this specific
Le 27/08/2019 à 10:00, Luca Ferrari a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 9:54 AM Arnaud L. wrote:
Any other idea ? I'll change the lines order for tonight's run, but that
is not what I'd call a solution...
Does it hangs against the same line content or the same line number?
Are
Le 22/08/2019 à 10:47, Arnaud L. a écrit :
On Windows, I have an unattended script that exports data overnight by
issuing psql commands like :
psql -f mycommands.sql
whith mycommands.sql containing a bunch of \copy lines like :
\copy (SELECT * FROM someview) TO
'\\windowsserver\windows
Le 22/08/2019 à 16:23, Arnaud L. a écrit :
Le 22/08/2019 à 16:21, Adrian Klaver a écrit :
The only thing I can think of at the moment is to put the offending line
in a separate script and see what happens.
Then I think I'll first try to switch the line orders. I'll execute this
a
Le 22/08/2019 à 20:00, Jerry Sievers a écrit :
Is the overnight run being done as the same DB user you are testing
with?
If not, then perhaps the automated user deviates in resource settings
and/or permissions, in turn resulting in sluggish performance caused by
thrashing and/or inferior query p
Le 22/08/2019 à 16:21, Adrian Klaver a écrit :
The only thing I can think of at the moment is to put the offending line
in a separate script and see what happens.
Then I think I'll first try to switch the line orders. I'll execute this
action last and see if it changes anything. If it doesn't,
Le 22/08/2019 à 16:00, Adrian Klaver a écrit :
The first thing I think of when seeing this sort of behavior on Windows
is anti-virus software. Doing you have any running on the machine?
You say it always hangs on the same line. Is that line doing something
different from the others? Say writing
Hi list
On Windows, I have an unattended script that exports data overnight by
issuing psql commands like :
psql -f mycommands.sql
whith mycommands.sql containing a bunch of \copy lines like :
\copy (SELECT * FROM someview) TO
'\\windowsserver\windowsshare\somefile.csv'
When I run this scrip
Le 27/03/2019 à 07:02, Kumar Prince NCS a écrit :
We are Upgrading PostgreSQL under Windows from v9.3 to 9.5. Following
steps from https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/pgupgrade.html
We are using PostgreSQL database for confluence application.
While running Step 9 , there is command to set path
Le 19/12/2018 à 11:41, Mike Martin a écrit :
cast(nullif(d.joineddate,NULL) as timestamp) != cast(nullif(s.joineddate,'') as timestamp)
Try with
d.joineddate IS DISTINCT FROM s.joineddate
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-comparison.html
Cheers
--
Arnaud
Le 16/11/2018 à 15:28, Ravi Krishna a écrit :
A better question should be, are there any production users of PG on Windows :-)
And the answer is yes, there are some !
Cheers
--
Arnaud
Le 25-06-18 à 18:47, chiru r a écrit :
Please suggest Schema/Data conversion opensource tools from MySQL to
PostgreSQL.
Hi.
I used this php script which did a pretty good job :
https://github.com/AnatolyUss/FromMySqlToPostgreSql
--
Regards
Le 01-06-18 à 14:21, Łukasz Jarych a écrit :
ODBC;DSN=PostgreSQL35W;DATABASE=AccessTest;SERVER=localhost;PORT=5432;*CA=d;A7=100;B0=255;B1=8190;BI=0;C2=;CX=1c305008b;A1=7.4*
When i was searching code for this in internet i found only:
DRIVER={PostgreSQL
Unicode(x64)};DATABASE=AccessTest;SERV
39 matches
Mail list logo