Sure, hence I wrote "likely"!
On Sat, 19 Jun 2021, 8:10 pm Tom Lane, wrote:
> Anand Sowmithiran writes:
> > This is very helpful to know , we *can* *likely count* on temporal to
> be part
> > of PG 15 !!
>
> You were just told *not* to count on that. Ma
This is very helpful to know , we can likely count on temporal to be part
of PG 15 !! I would be using Postgresql via Azure cloud[with Citus], so
looking forward to use temporal features in my current development [using
Extension] and then once it is part of PG 15, I guess that would make MSFT
to s
I am looking to use the temporal tables feature for keeping track of
changes to my table data. As of now, there is an pgxn.org provided
extension by which we could leverage this functionality, but *when Temporal
tables will become part of the main Postgresql release *[and not as an
extension] ? Eve
