If you are worried about the audit trigger and also an additional audit
table to hold all the rows , then you may get an additional flag added to
your base table deleted_flag and when delete happens, you just need to
update that flag through your code manually, but not physically delete the
record
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 4:37 AM Riku Iki wrote:
> I am wondering if there were preallocation related changes in PG16, and if it
> is possible to disable preallocation in PostgreSQL 16?
I have no opinion on the btrfs details, but I was wondering if someone
might show up with a system that doesn't
Hello,
My understanding is that the replication tools normally rely on the
database transaction logs to find the CDC/delta
changes(Insert/Update/Delete) for tables and then move those delta changes
to the target system/databases. Whatever may be the source database (It
might be open source postgres
čt 25. 4. 2024 v 18:46 odesílatel Sasmit Utkarsh
napsal:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> Thanks for the info. But is it not possible to have some kind of handling
> of an empty result set using libpq for the given procedure?
>
extension dblink uses libpq (to connect to other databases or servers). You
can check
Hi Pavel,
Thanks for the info. But is it not possible to have some kind of handling
of an empty result set using libpq for the given procedure?
Regards,
Sasmit Utkarsh
+91-7674022625
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 8:26 PM Pavel Stehule
wrote:
> Hi
>
> čt 25. 4. 2024 v 12:57 odesílatel Sasmit Utkars
Hi,
We have PostgreSQL server, which currently runs PostgreSQL 15 on compressed
btrfs.
I tried to migrate DB to PostgreSQL 16, and found that data is not being
compressed for PostgreSQL 16 server. One of the possible reason why btrfs
won't compress data is data preallocation.
When running "comps
Hello Markus,
keep it simple. Use a restored backup of the source db or this db itself
and then
Am 25.04.2024 um 09:55 schrieb Zwettler Markus (OIZ):
we have to migrate from hosted PG12 to containerized PG16 on private
cloud.
some of the installed PG12 extensions are not offered on the
contai
Hi
čt 25. 4. 2024 v 12:57 odesílatel Sasmit Utkarsh
napsal:
> Hi PostgreSQL Team,
>
> I'm trying to execute the stored procedure(details along with the program
> in the attachment) to fetch the records from the table for the inputs given
> in the code as well. I have already created the procedur
On 4/25/24 00:46, Kashif Zeeshan wrote:
I worked with both CentOS/RHEL 7/8.
What does the above mean relative to the original question?
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 3:55 AM Zwettler Markus (OIZ) <
markus.zwett...@zuerich.ch> wrote:
> we have to migrate from hosted PG12 to containerized PG16 on private
> cloud.
>
>
>
> some of the installed PG12 extensions are not offered on the containerized
> PG16, eg. PostGIS related extensions like
Hi PostgreSQL Team,
I'm trying to execute the stored procedure(details along with the program
in the attachment) to fetch the records from the table for the inputs given
in the code as well. I have already created the procedure in the db. But I
see some strange output when I try to fetch the detai
Hi Nick
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:56 PM Nick Renders wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have a Postgres server that intermittently logs the following:
>
> 2024-02-26 10:29:41.580 CET [63962] FATAL: could not open file
> "global/pg_filenode.map": Operation not permitted
> 2024-02-26 10:30:11.147 CET [90610
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:55 PM Zwettler Markus (OIZ) <
markus.zwett...@zuerich.ch> wrote:
> we have to migrate from hosted PG12 to containerized PG16 on private
> cloud.
>
>
>
> some of the installed PG12 extensions are not offered on the containerized
> PG16, eg. PostGIS related extensions like
we have to migrate from hosted PG12 to containerized PG16 on private cloud.
some of the installed PG12 extensions are not offered on the containerized
PG16, eg. PostGIS related extensions like pg_routing and ogr_fdw.
some of these extensions are not needed anymore. some of these extensions were
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:45 PM Adrian Klaver
wrote:
> On 4/2/24 16:53, David Gauthier wrote:
> > This is what we are running...
> > Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.9 (Maipo)
> >
> > In our pandora distrib, I see PG v15.3. I was wondering if there is
> > something even better. Can't s
15 matches
Mail list logo