On 10/5/23 15:46, David G. Johnston wrote:
On Thursday, October 5, 2023, Jeff Ross wrote:
Hi all,
CentOS 7 isn't quite dead yet but it appears that CentOS7 is not
included in the new yum repo file including 16.
Do those of us still on CentOS 7 wanting to upgrade to 16 now hav
On Thursday, October 5, 2023, Jeff Ross wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> CentOS 7 isn't quite dead yet but it appears that CentOS7 is not included
> in the new yum repo file including 16.
>
> Do those of us still on CentOS 7 wanting to upgrade to 16 now have to
> build from source?
>
>
https://yum.postgresq
Hi all,
CentOS 7 isn't quite dead yet but it appears that CentOS7 is not
included in the new yum repo file including 16.
Here's a bit from the latest repo file:
Name : pgdg-redhat-repo
Version : 42.0
Release : 35PGDG
Architecture: noarch
Install Date: (not installed)
Group
On Thu, 2023-10-05 at 10:39 +, Anuwat Sagulmontreechai wrote:
> Our customer install PG on Windows Server 2022 and need to use Foreign Table
> to connect
> to SQL Server on WS2022 too, so we tried to find the plug-in but
> unfortunately we found
> only Linux version. Could you please advise u
But honestly, the amount of text duplication hurts my "inner programmer".
And it would have to be generated dynamically, since you don't know how many
crops were delivered. #shudder
On 10/5/23 09:33, Dow Drake wrote:
Yes! Thanks, Alvaro! This is exactly the pattern I was trying to work out
Hi PG Support Team,
Our customer install PG on Windows Server 2022 and need to use Foreign Table to
connect to SQL Server on WS2022 too, so we tried to find the plug-in but
unfortunately we found only Linux version. Could you please advise us?
Thank you in advance for your help.
Best Regards,
Hi, I’m writing some kernel codes in pg15, and now I need to make a map struct,
I know c-lang doesn’t support this, so does pg support an internal struct?
Hopefully your replies.
Yes! Thanks, Alvaro! This is exactly the pattern I was trying to work out!
This community is awesome!
> On Oct 5, 2023, at 2:39 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> On 2023-Oct-04, Dow Drake wrote:
>
>> I want to insert a farm record, then insert two crops associated with that
>> farm, then inser
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 12:30 PM Marian Wendt wrote:
>
> With an INNER JOIN, both tables must be fully checked/matched (check
using EXPLAIN ANALYSIS -> HashJoin), so the index cannot be used here.
> Sorry, didn't consider the WITH part. Please share the detailed query
plan for more info.
Now, it r
Greetings,
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 03:10 Abhishek Bhola
wrote:
> Here is the update with compress-type=zst in the config file
> Process-max is still 30. *But it longer than before, around 27 hours 50
> mins*
>
> full backup: 20231004-130621F
> timestamp start/stop: 2023-10-04 13:06:21
On Sat, 30 Sept 2023, 23:37 Tom Lane, wrote:
>
> I think what you're asking for is a scheme whereby some rows in a
> table have datatype X in a particular column while other rows in
> the very same physical table have datatype Y in the same column.
>
An alternative for NOT NULL columns would be
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 11:35 AM Marian Wendt wrote:
> With an INNER JOIN, both tables must be fully checked/matched (check using
> EXPLAIN ANALYSIS -> HashJoin), so the index cannot be used here.
> Sorry, didn't consider the WITH part. Please share the detailed query
> plan for more info.
>
> The
On 2023-Oct-04, Dow Drake wrote:
> I want to insert a farm record, then insert two crops associated with that
> farm, then insert two deliveries for each of the the two crops so that in
> the end, my tables look like this:
If I understand you correctly, for each table you want one CTE with the
da
Hi,
Is it intended that indexes are not pushed down to union all
subqueries if even a single select contains a where clause? Is this
just not implemented, is it impossible to implement or am I doing
something wrong?
The following query does a SeqScan for "bikes" and "cars" tables even
though Ind
Hi,
Is it intended that indexes are not pushed down to union all
subqueries if even a single select contains a where clause? Is this
just not implemented, is it impossible to implement or am I doing
something wrong?
The following query does a SeqScan for "bikes" and "cars" tables even
though Ind
Hi,
Is it intended that indexes are not pushed down to union all
subqueries if even a single select contains a where clause? Is this
just not implemented, is it impossible to implement or am I doing
something wrong?
The following query does a SeqScan for "bikes" and "cars" tables even
though Ind
Hi Stephen
Here is the update with compress-type=zst in the config file
Process-max is still 30. *But it longer than before, around 27 hours 50
mins*
full backup: 20231004-130621F
timestamp start/stop: 2023-10-04 13:06:21+09 / 2023-10-05
15:56:03+09
wal start/stop: 000
17 matches
Mail list logo