>You could likely get an idea of how the surplus filter is slowing down
>execution if you widen the filter to ensure it includes all possible
>"ladate" values, run the query, then run the query again without the
>date range filter. I would guess it'll only save you a few percent,
>but I'm open to b
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 at 00:42, Umut TEKİN wrote:
> @Marc, I think there is no problem.Even though it says it is filtered by
> ladate, it is not. Because of the partition.
> As you can see for each index scan it uses a different partition and those
> partition boundaries are already specified logi
